« Reflections on useR! 2014 | Main | In case you missed it: June 2014 Roundup »

July 08, 2014

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

There's a function package_dependencies in the tools package which does something similar.

But you do need to be careful how you write this: for example, my rgl package is in your list of 63, but not in your graph. (It is suggested by knitr, it's not a true dependency. Not sure what the criteria were for the graph.)

Why are there packages displayed in the graph that are not linked by arrows to an initial package (not displayed as dependencies)? Ex. Sp and Maptools

Hi, Duncan

I should have mentioned in the post that pkgDeps() is a wrapper around tools::package_dependencies where I set defaults for my application. I'll update the blog post to reflect this.

I am working on tracing the differences between the package list and the graph. The root cause has to do with different settings for recursion in the two functions. Once resolved, I'll publish the revision.

Andrie

The comments to this entry are closed.


R for the Enterprise

Got comments or suggestions for the blog editor?
Email David Smith.
Follow revodavid on Twitter Follow David on Twitter: @revodavid

Search Revolutions Blog