« Preparing Big Data for Analysis in R | Main | Because it's Friday: Word Crimes »

July 17, 2014


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

> The article Meta-analysis and its problems by H J Eysenck captures the issues and is well worth reading.

I think you meant to link not file:///C:/Users/Joe.Rickert/Downloads/bmj00458-0043%20(1).pdf but http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2541015/pdf/bmj00458-0043.pdf

It's worth mentioning the Nate Silver, and similar, got to be rich and famous doing a version of meta-analysis. He gets around the problem of differing samples from differing sources by explicitly weighting according to the directives from Sarah Bellum.

Here is a meta-analysis I did using R last year (or rather, using R to attempt to replicate and check a published meta-analysis done by someone else who unfortunately used a spreadsheet...): https://github.com/timchurches/meta-analyses/blob/master/benefits-of-reproducible-research/benefits-of-reproducible-research.md

The comments to this entry are closed.

Search Revolutions Blog

Got comments or suggestions for the blog editor?
Email David Smith.
Follow revodavid on Twitter Follow David on Twitter: @revodavid
Get this blog via email with Blogtrottr